https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17329
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Thomas, > Summary: it's the combination of an optimization flag (-O) with debugging > symbols (-g) that fails. > > So, after all, maybe it's more a gcc issue than a binutils issue? Almost certainly. The bug is probably that gcc is generating a short version of a branch instruction (on instruction sequence) when it should be producing a long version instead. Probably because it has incorrectly calculated the lengths of the instructions between the source and destination of the branch. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
