https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at ucw dot cz --- > So is it sufficient (and safe) to warn just on the presence of __gnu_slim_lto? Yes, when __gnu_slim_lto gets into linking/archiving/nm, I think it is safe to warn about missing plugin. Honza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
