https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16803

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  1b6aeedbb8e8f6c65d228f0dab3dab522d2517bb (commit)
      from  92b1b67865c719e83d12578e584ca5e20d172eac (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1b6aeedbb8e8f6c65d228f0dab3dab522d2517bb

commit 1b6aeedbb8e8f6c65d228f0dab3dab522d2517bb
Author: Maria Guseva <m.gus...@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 3 11:42:05 2014 +0100

    This fixes a problem building large (> 2Gb) binaries on 32-bit hosts. 
Using a
    long type instead of long long meant that bfd_seek (SET) could be called
with a
    negative offset.

        PR ld/16803
        * elf.c (_bfd_elf_set_section_contents): Use correct type to hold
        file position.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 bfd/ChangeLog |    6 ++++++
 bfd/elf.c     |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to