http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14072

Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
                 CC|                            |nickc at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2012-05-16 11:20:09 
UTC ---
Hi Daniel,

  I like the patch in principle, but I feel that there is a problem with it -
we cannot rely upon building the binutils only in a glibc environment.  They
are also built with other C libraries.  I cannot think of a clean way to test
for the presence of system header files however, so maybe AH_VERBATIM macros
could be made conditional somehow ?  Perhaps on the use of the
--enable-maintainer-mode config option ?

  You also mention that config.h is included twice sometimes.  Does your patch
catch this ?  I am not aware of any config.h redefinition warnings when
building the binutils locally, so can you tell me more about where and when
this happens ?

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to