http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
--- Comment #6 from Jan Waclawek <konfera at efton dot sk> 2012-05-03 22:37:12
UTC ---
Hi Johann,
I think what you wrote there is a bit unfair.
The original bug report IMO contained everything needed to reproduce the bug
and to assess it as different from the "trampolines high" case, without the
need to read the avrfreaks.net thread. You shouldn't have edited out the
"original post" from the quote in your response; that really changed the
meaning of that sentence altogether.
Also, do you really believe I would post a bug report without searching for
existing duplicate bug report? I thought my work, however informally presented,
doesn't indicate such approach.
Moreover, I also believe that absolute placement of labels through .org
(however deprecated it is for "real life" usage) is more illustrative of the
underlying reason than your .space solution. Also the usage of --debug-stubs
switch is not coincidental.
In the avrfreaks.net thread, there is further information I inferred from
reading the sources, which might be useful for those who would attempt to fix
the bug. It may be incorrect, of course, as I did not have time to dig deep
enough (read: I have to feed my family and as I said elsewhere already, I just
tried to help others with their bugs and my code does not suffer from this bug
due to my coding habits); that's why I did not push it futher. I believe those
who are genuinely interested don't mind reading the post or whatever further
information is available.
Have a nice day (or night)!
Jan
----- Original Message ---------------
Subject: [Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with
norelaxation
From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 21:57:19 +0000
To: konf...@efton.sk
>http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
>
>--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-03
>21:57:19 UTC ---
>(In reply to comment #2)
>
>> Please re-read [...] the post at the given link.
>
>Please make bug reports that are self-contained.
>
>If there is information missing to reproduce the issue or to understand it,
>please add the information to render the bug report self-contained.
>
>If the PR is already self-contained and includes all information, a link is
>simply distracting and confusing and superfluous.
>
>Thanks.
>
>--
>Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You reported the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
