http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12931
--- Comment #5 from Dave Martin <dave.martin at linaro dot org> 2011-06-29 
16:47:08 UTC ---
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:33 PM, nickc at redhat dot com
<sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12931
>
> Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>                 CC|                            |nickc at redhat dot com
>         Resolution|                            |FIXED
>
> --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2011-06-29 
> 16:33:44 UTC ---
> Hi Dave,
>
>  Thanks for reporting this problem and providing a patch to fix it too.  I
> think that 2 byte alignment should be fine for thumb-code-containing sections,
> but if someone does come up with a scenario where this assumption does not 
> work
> then we can always fix the assembler again.

That seems reasonable -- I think the proposed fix should be a useful
interim step, since it's pretty simple and makes the situation no
worse.

Did the patch look sensible to you?  I'm no gas hacker...


Cheers
---Dave

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to