http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
Summary: ld testsuite regressions with 20110604, compared to
20110602
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: d...@debian.org
on x86-linux-gnu, the following test cases fail for me on x86-linux-gnu:
W: [ld-elf/elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-elf/maxpage4
W: [ld-elf/elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-elf/commonpage2
W: [ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-x86-64/lp64-3
W: [ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-x86-64/lp64-2
W: [ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-x86-64/ia32-2
W: [ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): Mixed x86_64 and i386
input test 2
W: [ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): Mixed x86_64 and i386
input test 1
W: [ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-x86-64/ilp32-2
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
