http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
--- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com> 2011-05-27 17:39:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I still got > > g++ -W -Wall -Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -o incremental_test_4 -Wl,--incremental-full > -Bgcctestdir/ two_file_test_1.o two_file_test_1b.o two_file_test_tmp.o > two_file_test_main.o > gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 't1_2()' > gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here > gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 't1a()' > gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here > gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 'f10()' > gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here > .... This doesn't make sense to me -- two_file_test_2.o isn't mentioned on the link line at all, and the linker shouldn't be looking at it. At this step in the Makefile rule, two_file_test_tmp.o should be a copy of two_file_test_2_v1.o, so it does make sense that two_file_test_2.o would have duplicate symbols, but I don't see how it's being linked given that command. I thought maybe I forgot to check in the regenerated testsuite/Makefile.in, but I checked and it looks OK in cvs. Did your build somehow skip regenerating testsuite/Makefile? -cary -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
