http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #22 from Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
2011-03-09 09:49:09 UTC ---
> --- Comment #21 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2011-03-09
> 01:56:59 UTC ---
> There's not much point to trying to use gold to build gcc until gold passes at
> least most of its tests.
Ok.
> The failure on basic_static_test looks like you don't have libc.a or
> libm.a--that is, it looks like gcc -static is always going to fail, whether
> using gold or the existing linker. Is that correct?
Right: starting from Solaris 10, static system libs are gone, and 64-bit
static libs didn't exist ever, even when 64-bit support was introduced
in Solaris 7.
> I committed a patch which should fix the problem of passing too many values to
> readv.
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
> I don't know what's going on with the other two errors.
I'll investigate as time permits.
Rainer
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
