------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-30
22:35 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here is a conservative patch.
>
> Index: bfd/elflink.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elflink.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.372
> diff -u -r1.372 elflink.c
> --- bfd/elflink.c 14 Apr 2010 08:29:33 -0000 1.372
> +++ bfd/elflink.c 28 Jul 2010 22:21:53 -0000
> @@ -5374,6 +5374,7 @@
> const struct elf_backend_data *bed = get_elf_backend_data (dynobj);
> unsigned long int *counts;
> bfd_size_type amt;
> + unsigned int no_improvement_count = 0;
>
> /* Possible optimization parameters: if we have NSYMS symbols we say
> that the hashing table must at least have NSYMS/4 and at most
> @@ -5458,7 +5459,10 @@
> {
> best_chlen = max;
> best_size = i;
> + no_improvement_count = 0;
> }
> + else if (++no_improvement_count == 100)
> + break;
> }
>
> free (counts);
>
It looks good to me. Please post it to binutils mailing list. Thanks.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11843
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
