Thank you, Nick. Much appreciated. Does the assembler allow for both ldrsheq and ldreqsh? (the latter version is what the ARM docs indicate).
When will I be able to get a canned version of the updated tool-chain? Thanks, Matt On Monday, June 21, 2010 05:53:21 am Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > > Is this the right place for this? > > Yes. :-) > > > The GNU assembler takes the following instruction (for example): > > > > ldreqsh r9, [sl], #0x3f > > > > and assembles it to: > > > > 0x00da94d0 > > This is a bug, now fixed. The current version of GAS assembles it to: > > 00da93ff ldrsheq r9, [sl], #63 ; 0x3f > > > Please help? Which is accurate? Should I trust the assembler, > > which is responsible for the actual driving of the processor? > > or the documentation which is the Bible of ARM? > > In this case always trust ARM's documentation. If there is a > discrepancy it is the assembler, or possibly the disassembler, that is > to blame. > > Cheers > Nick > > > -- Matthew Carpenter m...@inguardians.com http://www.inguardians.com PGP Fingerprint: 87EB 54A8 FB42 0A0E B8AE CDA7 FF99 2A64 E70F 4466 hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
