------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-04-19
14:37 -------
I don't think we should support ".eqv param, ebp-4"
since it is evaluated and fully resolved at the first
use. We got ".eqv param, -4" starting from the
second use.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|x86_64-gentoo-linux, x86_32-|
|gentoo-linux, cygwin |
GCC host triplet|x86_64-gentoo-linux, x86_32-|
|gentoo-linux, cygwin |
GCC target triplet|x86_64-gentoo-linux, x86_32-|i386/x86-64
|gentoo-linux, cygwin |
Version|2.20 |2.21 (HEAD)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
