------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-10-12 23:53
-------
I'm confused about whether gold's lack of DT_NEEDED resolution is
intended to affect only pure-indirect or merely mixed-direct-indirect
dependencies. Specifically:
liba { int a() { return b(); } }
libb { int b() { return 0; } }
main() { a() } -la # libb a pure indirect dependency
- versus -
main() { b() } -la # libb a direct dependency
If the latter, I'm more sympathetic to the desire to have a program state
its own direct depencencies.
If the former, I'm more sympathetic to a program not having to know all the
indirect dependencies of all of its shared libraries.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10238
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
