Hi Keith,
Strangely, although I
didn't preserve the generated `deffilep.h', and it now appears
nowhere in either the source or the build tree, its absence doesn't
seem to affect the success of the build; is it a quirk of building
for the `mingw32' target, that it isn't required, or is it just
superfluous?
Weird. It is included by ld/pe-dll.[ch] which are used by the
i386-mingw32 target, so I would have expected your build to complain.
Possibly there is a missing dependency in the Makefile so that pe-dll.o
does not know that it needs the deffile.h header.
I plan to repackage binutils-2.19, for redistribution from the MinGW
site on SourceForge, and I would like to save other users from the
problems I have experienced. Presumably:
* rescheduling the timestamps for bfd/doc/{elf.texi,bfd.info}
* adding ld/deffilep.c
are appropriate.
Agreed.
Should I also add ld/deffilep.h?
Yes I think so.
Cheers
Nick
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
