------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-13
19:12 -------
> Unfortunately, the relevant section
>
> We recommend the use of GNU binutils 2.14 or later, or the vendor tools
> (Sun as, Sun ld). Note that your mileage may vary if you use a combination
> of the GNU tools and the Sun tools: while the combination GNU as + Sun ld
> should reasonably work, the reverse combination Sun as + GNU ld is known to
> cause memory corruption at runtime in some cases for C++ programs.
>
> is relatively vague.
What's vague exactly?
> Anyway, the two other cases I tried (GNU as + Sun ld and GNU as + GNU ld)
> worked resonably well when comparing testsuite results to the Sun as + Sun
> ld baseline. Only the Sun as + GNU ld case broke in several respects: this
> PR + ld/7027 + GCC PRs libgomp/38086 and libstdc++/38092.
Yes, it's effectively unsupported, hence my message.
> Unfortunately, I need at least one configuration as a baseline for a proper
> fix for GCC PR bootstrap/33100.
I don't see why, you don't need a baseline for a bootstrap problem.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7023
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
