I was waiting for a more informative reply but that didn't happen, and I
lost track of this whole thing until someone reminded me recently.
Which source file should I put my stuff into ? An existing one, a new
one ?
I'd like to get this thing over with ...
Danny
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 15:39 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
> (Sorry about the delay in replying, I am a bit snowed under at the
> moment).
>
> > One of the earlier suggestions was for the default print_pdata to be
> > used when the new field is NULL. This is how I implemented it.
>
> Doh, yes I should have realized that.
>
>
> > I don't think I understand. If it's a static function in peXXigen.c then
> > I can't use it in e.g. pe-arm-wince.c to initialise the structure.
>
> > Also right now there are two functions. The original one, and one to
> > handle the ARM and SH4 compressed pdata cases. Putting them together in
> > one file is fine by me, but putting them in a source file that can be
> > included more than once seems wrong. This would, I think, apply to both
> > the function I'm adding and to the default one. Should they not be in
> > another source file (one that doesn't get the XX treatment) so they get
> > included just once ?
>
> Yes of course. (Sorry my brain was not firing on all cylinders that day).
>
> > So I still think I need a source file that doesn't get the XX treatment
> > to put both functions in as non-static functions. But I am probably
> > overlooking something, I'm new to the binutils source.
>
> No, I think that you are right.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
>
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
