------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-05-14 15:00 ------- Subject: Re: stab warnings cause linker errors
Hi Ian, > If I understand what you are getting at, that's how warning symbols > work. Look at MWARN in linker.c. It creates a new symbol, and sets > u.i.link to point to the existing symbol. Perhaps some list somewhere > is still pointing at the old symbol. Right. It seems that two entries for the same symbol name are created in the hash table and I have yet to find out why. ie an undefined entry for _f is created first and then a defined entry for _f is created afterwards. What I have yet to discover is why the second entry does not just replace the first. I think it must have something to do with the symbol being associated with a warning, but I have not yet found out exactly what is happening. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6478 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
