------- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2007-12-21 18:13 ------- Subject: Re: INTOUCH instruction incorrectly disassembled.
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 17:13 +0000, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-12-21 17:13 > ------- > I think that you may need to define a new opcode operator, one like 'c' but > which only accepts 'ic','dc' or 'bc' and then use this. > PS. Incidentally it would be great if you could include a new gas testsuite > test > in any future patch which would check to make sure that the syntax is parsed > and > disassembled correctly.... It certainly would, but as I explained early on, I don't quite know how to do this. I'll try to use some existing test case as a model and see what I can do. Meanwhile, support for coldfire in GDB looks pretty borked too. Before I go duplicating effort, does anybody know who is maintaining GDB and binutils coldfire? I will ask on the GDB list as well. shap -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5457 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
