------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-28 12:49
-------
Hi Andrew,
Does the problem still exist with an assembler built from the current head of
the binutils sources in the CVS repository ? (I suspect that it does, but I
would like this confirmed and there does not seem to be a simple test case
available).
Thanks very much for suggesting a patch. It does look OK, but there is one
problem - you only provide definitions of the TC_BEGIN_UNALIGNED and
TC_END_UNALIGNED macros for the sparc target. Building for any other target
will result in a compile time error for the undefined macros. Please could you
supply a revised patch that corrects this ?
It would also help to know how you tested the patch. Did you run the gas
testsuite after building a toolchain with the patch applied ? If so, were there
any regressions ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
