seen with 20070718:
Test results, compared with installed binutils (20070426):
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (normal) (PIC
main, non PIC so)
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (protected_weak)
(non PIC, load offset)
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (hidden_normal)
(PIC main, non PIC so)
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (hidden_normal)
(non PIC)
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility
(protected_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so)
I: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] progression (FAIL -> PASS): visibility
(protected_weak) (non PIC)
W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (non PIC)
seen with 20070804:
Test results, compared with installed binutils (20070426):
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (protected_weak)
(non PIC, load offset)
W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (hidden_normal)
(PIC main, non PIC so)
I: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] progression (FAIL -> PASS): visibility
(protected_weak) (non PIC)
W: [ld-shared/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): shared (non PIC, load
offset)
--
Summary: [regression] failing testcases on m68k-linux-gnu
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: doko at debian dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,zippel at linux-m68k dot org
GCC target triplet: m68k-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4897
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
