------- Additional Comments From axelheider at gmx dot de 2007-07-17 21:40 ------- Well, in this case I would actually expect something like an error at ".unreq rsXX1" with the message ".unreq not allowed, because another .req definition at line XXX already depends on it". A un-definition of "rsXX1" should not be allowerd when other things depend on it, too.
-- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4651 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
