X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
We aren't consistent in the format we use on displacement:
----
static void
print_operand_value (char *buf, int hex, bfd_vma disp)
...
static void
OP_E (int bytemode, int sizeflag)
{
...
print_operand_value (scratchbuf, !riprel, disp);
...
print_operand_value (scratchbuf, modrm.mod != 1, disp);
...
print_operand_value (scratchbuf, 1, disp);
...
print_operand_value (scratchbuf, 0, disp);
...
print_operand_value (scratchbuf, modrm.mod != 1, disp);
...
print_operand_value (scratchbuf, 1, disp & 0xffff);
}
----
That is we use hex or decimal for displacement, depending on Intel
mode, RIP relative, modrm.mod != 1 and 16bit address mode. It is
confusing.
--
Summary: We aren't consistent on displacement in x86 disassembler
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4430
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
