------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-23 14:04 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi H.J. > > I am not sure that we can produce a more explicit error message without > going > into a lot of effort to record undefined symbols, but maybe the attached patch > will help a little. With this applied I get the following output: > > foo.t:7 unable to compute value of load base because the following > expression > is nonconstant: > ((ADDR (.foo) + 0xfff) & 0xfffffffffffff000) > > What do you think ? > > Obviously I would need to run through the linker testsuite for all the > toollchains to make sure that this does not break anything, and also a similar > chage is probably needed for the other two locations where a nonconstant > expression is reported, but I think that this patch is certainly a beginning.
Can we record line number in tree so that exp_print_tree can print line number as an option? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4090 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
