------- Additional Comments From steveo at syslang dot net 2006-07-10 18:56 ------- Sorry, but this is not acceptable. The current capabilities of gas allow for include, macro, conditional and equates. What's not supplied are looping constructs. The whole point of a macroassembler is to provide exactly what gas and gasp did combined. Not that I have a choice, but if I did, I would request that gasp be put back as part of binutils or that another alternative be supplied.
BTW, m4 is not a viable alternative. As far as I'm concerned, gasp could be written in m4, but it's not a currently useable replacement Do you know why gasp became deprecated in the first place? And is my bug (and my reasonig) capable of getting it put back as part of the package? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2895 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
