------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-16 18:17 ------- Hi Brian, Hi Anastasius,
>> Yes, although I am not sure if an easy fix exists. In the meantime >> please could you try the attached patch which might work. The problem >> with it is that it has to guess as to the correct VMA value to use. I >> am not sure if matters though. It might be that any non-zero value will >> be valid, even if it overlaps with another section. > > It does matter. PE executables need contiguous section aligned VMAs. See: > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2003-01/msg00210.html Stupid spec! Oh well, I am uploading a revised patch that *might* work. It is completely untested though, but I would appreciate any feedback you can give me. Cheers Nick -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1391 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
