------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-11-07 00:38 ------- Subject: Re: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
> > After all, if the fixup is for a dword, none of the insn handling code in > > md_apply_fix is appropriate. In fact, it would be even better to avoid > > anything > > in md_apply_fix that assumes a fixup is for an insn, ie. bfd_hppa_insn2fmt > > shouldn't be in md_apply_fix at all. Instead, pass the insn fmt (if it is > > an > > insn) in via fx_r_format. > > I agree. It appears that there aren't any conflicts between data and > insn format values. It also appears that insn formats are set by pa_ip, > so it shouldn't be necessary to call bfd_hppa_insn2fmt. I took a quick look at this today. It will take a bit of work to sort this out as the format numbers generated by pa_ip are somewhat inconsistent with those generated by bfd_hppa_insn2fmt. The numbers generated by pa_ip can't simply be changed to match bfd_hppa_insn2fmt as they are used by elf_hppa_reloc_final_type. Dave -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1804 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
