------- Additional Comments From george at mvista dot com 2005-06-06 15:59 ------- Subject: Re: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-06 14:56 > ------- > I checked in my patch. I will have a followup patch later. > > nm and gdb may or may not share that piece of code. You need to file a gdb > bug report. The problem is knowing where the info gets lost. My initial study seemed to indicate that it was ld that was doing it, thus this report. > > BTW, does entry.S have dwarf debug info? does gdb get wrong line number on > functions or just variables? Yes, I use -gdwarf-2. The wrong info shows up on "bt" into entry.S where gdb (run in emacs) shows the source file. What is displayed, ususlly, is some header file. This is line number/source related. The reported function is the nearest preceeding label and seems to be right. > -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
