Hi,
I am using GNU assembler 2.15 (on WIN 2000)
I have few questions about ".set" pseudo op-code
Please check with following codes.
1)
.set tuv, 1
.long tuv
.set tuv, _undef+2
.long tuv
In above case first .long evaluates to .long 1
But in second .long no relocation information is generated, _undef is droped.
Should GAS generate any relocation here?
2)
.set tuv, _undef
.set tuv, tuv+1
.long tuv
For above code GAS showed "symbol definition loop encountered" error. But if
you change def of 'tuv' as,
.set tuv, 1
.set tuv, tuv+_undef
.long tuv
Then no error is generated (but no relocation also).
Is that the absolute value gets the high priority? Please let me know
how ".set" is processed.
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Jay
--
Summary: GAS ".set" pseudo op-code handling
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: jp dot subhash at samsung dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=836
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
