On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 12:47:12PM +0200, Emanuele Torre wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Emanuele Torre wrote:
> > The current order of these cases does not seem logical to me; it is
> > probably incorrect: I would expect the PF_ASSIGNRHS case not to care
> > about whether the expansion is quoted, and thus also to take precedence
> > over the case for double quoted expansions outside of assignments.
> > 
> > Unless I am missing something, reordering those two cases seems to fix
> > the regression; so, the fix probably looks similar to something like
> > this:
> 
> I will point out that this patch also changes the behaviour of  [@]@k
> in assignments, and maybe also that of some other @OP expansions, to
> one which I would think is more correct:
> 
> bash-5.3.9
>   $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[*]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0+a+1+b"
>   $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0+a+1+b"
>   $ IFS=  a=(a b) b=${a[*]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0a1b"
>   $ IFS=  a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0 a 1 b"
> 
> devel (2d4ba0c618584d3554165b9484d921ec8c4e4523) with the patch applied
>   $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[*]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0+a+1+b"
>   $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0 a 1 b"
>   $ IFS=  a=(a b) b=${a[*]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0a1b"
>   $ IFS=  a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k}; declare -p b
>   declare -- b="0 a 1 b"
> 
> That is, [@] → " " and [*] → IFS  as opposed to the current  IFS  for
> both unless IFS='', in which case [@] → " ", [*] → "".
> 
> o/
>  emanuele6

Sorry; this was inaccurate. It seems that devel's behaviour was already
different from bash-5.3.9's before my patch with regards to b=${a[@]@k}.
However, my patch does change the behaviour of b="${a[@]@k}" which had
the same issue as b="${!a[@]}"

bash-5.3.9
  $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k} c="${a[@]@k}"; declare -p b c
  declare -- b="0+a+1+b"
  declare -- c="0+a+1+b"

devel (2d4ba0c618584d3554165b9484d921ec8c4e4523)
  $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k} c="${a[@]@k}"; declare -p b c
  declare -- b="0 a 1 b"
  declare -- c="0+a+1+b"

devel (2d4ba0c618584d3554165b9484d921ec8c4e4523) with my patch applied
  $ IFS=+ a=(a b) b=${a[@]@k} c="${a[@]@k}"; declare -p b c
  declare -- b="0 a 1 b"
  declare -- c="0 a 1 b"

o/
 emanuele6

Reply via email to