> We know what "$@" is supposed to do. And something like "x${@}y" is
> well-defined also -- you simply prefix "x" to the first word, and append
> "y" to the final word.
> But I don't know how "$@$@" is supposed to be interpreted. I do not see
> anything in the official wording that explains how it should work.
As the doc you just mention said: let's set A B C
"x$@y" yA" "B" "Cy"
So the only consistent behavior I see is
"$@$@" A" "B" "CA" "B" "C"
^-("$3$1")
"$@ $@" A" "B" "C A" "B" "C"
^-("$3 $1")
I'm really currious: do you see another one ?
regards
--
Marc Chantreux
Pôle CESAR (Calcul et services avancés à la recherche)
Université de Strasbourg
14 rue René Descartes,
BP 80010, 67084 STRASBOURG CEDEX
03.68.85.60.79
