Emanuele Torre <torreemanue...@gmail.com> writes: > Yes, clearly that is influencing this new behaviour, but this is new: > <(<file) >(<file) did not have that special behaviour previously.
As I understand it, neither of those constructions is syntactically valid, to the degree that Bash's syntax is well-defined. "<" is magic and its use is defined in only certain situations. How did you discover these constructions? Dale
