On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 05:09:52PM +0200, Andreas Kähäri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:04:50PM +0200, alex xmb ratchev wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, 15:19 Kerin Millar <k...@plushkava.net> wrote:
> > > Curiously, ARRAY_EXPORT can be defined in config-top.h. It's probably safe
> > > to say that nobody uses it (nor should anybody wish to upon realising how
> > > it works).
> > 
> > does it make too big copies or wha ..
> 
> On Unix systems, environment variables are plain key-value pairs of
> strings.  An array in bash is not a key-value pair of strings, but
> a list of strings (and corresponding indexes).  The ARRAY_EXPORT
> configuration option (which I believe isn't settable from the
> "configure" script, and which I've never tried enabling) presumably
> makes arrays exportable somehow (probably only to other bash shell
> instances, similar to how "exportable functions" work).

For the record, here's the snippet from config-top.h:

/* Define to 1 if you want to be able to export indexed arrays to processes
   using the foo=([0]=one [1]=two) and so on */
/* #define ARRAY_EXPORT 1 */

I've never tried it, so I don't know how it plays out in practice.  It
does make me think of bash's exportable functions, and the shellshock
vulnerability which was spotlighted a while back, but I don't have any
idea whether this would introduce any security vulnerabilities.

I wonder what specific issues Kerin is thinking about.

Reply via email to