On Wed, May 31, 2023, 16:07 Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > On 5/30/23 4:46 PM, Robert Elz wrote: > > Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:28:57 -0400 > > From: Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> > > Message-ID: <ad399376-280e-bcdd-1aff-740f1a6ea...@case.edu> > > > > | Hmmmm. That's not the only option. How about we load it if found > but mark > > | it as not enabled? It will still take `enable -d' to delete it. > > > > That wouldn't match the man page, and isn't really rational. > > The documentation can always be changed to match a change in behavior. > > > > > The man page says: > > > > The -f option means to load the new builtin command name from > > shared object filename, on systems that support dynamic loading. > > > > and > > > > If no options are supplied and a name is not a shell builtin, > > enable will attempt to load name from a shared object named name, > > as if the command were ``enable -f name name . > > I think it's reasonable to stay like that, and change the behavior as > Emanuele proposes. >
i didnt get her / hisb.. text .. i much text dont get i just have issue with functionality and speed i suggest a meta data structure , like solution for many elses too for like , make lists and process maximally more in batch , .. that for speed u dont yet have anything such but i must mention .. or a similiar as question .. if i understood right new version auto includes these , bash'ins , .. how much slower is bash acting on that load than without ( and fix to better -> faster ) one big way is optimized batch processing , like .. -0 null sep also i say we need two d sep = \0\0 , subsep = \0 instead sep = \0 , subsep = \1 in read / mapfile / somewhere <small include more logical features reminder> u can maybe write read2d or mapfile2d .c as bash in nevermind .. greets -- > ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer > ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates > Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/ > > >
