Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> writes: > On 3/23/23 18:23, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 9:16 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: >>> I see that Bash won't compile with a C23 compiler, since it still uses >>> old-style function definitions which C23 no longer supports. Is there >>> any effort and/or interest in fixing this portability problem in Bash? >> I believe this was done a few months ago on the devel branch. >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/commit/?h=devel&id=a61ffa78ede6df4d1127fddd2e8a1a77a7186ea1 > > Oh, thanks, I was looking at the wrong branch. > > However, Bash's devel branch still has old-style function definitions > and therefore won't compile with a strict C23 compiler. For example, > get_variable_value in variables.c is old-style. I assume there would > be interest in fixing remaining areas where Bash won't port to C23?
I hope so. I'm waiting for a review of an issue in one of its configure checks with a strict compiler too [0]. [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2023-02/msg00000.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
