2023年2月5日(日) 4:48 Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu>: > I would be interested in the outcome of a discussion like this on the > austin-group-l mailing list. I very much doubt this would happen, but > anything's possible.
Thank you. I'm thinking of opening a discussion there. In the previous time that I raised the discussion about ``no-argument return in trap handlers'', I directly posted an email to the mailing list [1]. Fortunately, I got about ten replies but later, unfortunately, it was finally forgotten without any conclusion. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/austin-group-l@opengroup.org/msg06011.html So, this time, I am thinking of trying to submit it to the issue tracker. The present discussion about the function name is not really a bug of the standard, but there seem to be also questions about the standard in the issue list, so I guess I can also submit a discussion with a possible change for marking it as `unspecified'. However, it seems I need a separate account in the tracker to create an issue in the tracker, and I need to contact the Austin Group Chair to apply for the account. I'll contact the chair, but it might take some time to get an account and open an issue. [2] https://www.opengroup.org/austin/ -- Koichi
