Emanuele Torre <torreemanue...@gmail.com> writes:
> `declare -f "something="' fails with the following error:
>
> $ declare -f 'a=x'
> bash: declare: cannot use `-f' to make functions
> That error is not very useful. Bash makes `declare -f' fail with that
> error when an argument looks like an assignment.
It's an interesting mess. Looking at the definition of "declare", the
"=" is used to separate the name from the value being assigned to the
name:
declare [-aAfFgiIlnrtux] [-p] [name[=value] ...]
So the statement above is an attempt to declare the name "a" as a
function, with the value somehow being "x".
There's a difficulty because recent Bashes have allowed function names
that are not "names" in the Bash sense:
fname () compound-command [redirection]
function fname [()] compound-command [redirection]
This defines a function named fname. [...]
When in posix mode,
fname must be a valid shell name and may not be the name of one
of the POSIX special builtins. In default mode, a function
name can be any unquoted shell word that does not contain $.
name A word consisting only of alphanumeric characters and underâ
scores, and beginning with an alphabetic character or an underâ
score. Also referred to as an identifier.
In default mode, you actually can do
$ function a=b { printf hi\\n; }
though you can't execute it:
$ a=b foo
bash: foo: command not found
You say the error is not very useful, but it seems to me that the error
is doing exactly what is intended; you *shouldn't* have an argument that
looks like an assignment. IMO the fact that you can use "function" to
declare a function with "=" in its name is a mis-feature.
Dale
