Robert Elz wrote in <16667.1660234...@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>: | Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:22:12 +0200 | From: Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> | Message-ID: <20220811142212.jhlpj%stef...@sdaoden.eu> | | |||> Hm. Well i agree that precedence rules which loose a construct |||> completely (in that =5 is lost in I=5?I:J) is weird, but other | |I seem to have lost/missed whatever message that was originally in, but |nothing is lost there | | I=5?I:J |is | I = ( 5 > I : J ) | |and since 5 is true, that amounts to | | I = I | |There's nothing weird about that at all, no more than | | 3+2 * 7 | |giving 17, rather than 35 is weird. Precedence matters.
Yes. Confusion. Nothing but confusion. And not waiting for settlement. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
