Hello. 'Struggling with a Dijkstra two stack parser i am thankful to be able to compare against bash that uses a completely different and correct parser!
I stumbled upon this (bash 5.1.16); i find it "understandable" in respect to clarity, but inconsistent, and also in hindsight to the announcement of a forthcoming release i thought i report it quick: $ bash -c 'I=10; echo $((1++I)); echo $I' bash: line 1: 1++I: syntax error in expression (error token is "++I") $ bash -c 'I=10; echo $((1++1)); echo $I' 10 $ bash -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10+++I ))>"' <21> $ bash -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10+ ++I ))>"' <21> $ bash -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10+ +I ))>"' <20> I would find it more consistent if nothing would be whitespace affine. (The parsers in the wild are exactly so, very much including mine which leans upon the busybox shell parser, for example $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10+ +I ))>"' <20> $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10++I ))>"' <20> $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10+++I ))>"' <21> $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10++ + + + + +I ))>"' <20> $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10++ +++I ))>"' sh: arithmetic syntax error $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10++ ++ +I ))>"' sh: arithmetic syntax error $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10+ + ++ +I ))>"' sh: arithmetic syntax error $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10 + + ++ +I ))>"' sh: arithmetic syntax error $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10 + + ++ + +I ))>"' sh: arithmetic syntax error $ busybox.static sh -c 'I=10;echo "<$(( +10 + + + + + +I ))>"' <20> But am not ready here yet. Just for comparison.) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
