On 5/29/22 7:33 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2022, 06:56 AA via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again
SHell, <bug-bash@gnu.org> wrote:

Maybe the concern is that any additional calls (such as checking for path
existence) may have unintended consequences [but that] seems unlikely.

Therefore, IMHO it is very hard to argue with the fact that the file
passed to the kernel does in fact exist


Actually it's quite easy to argue with that: a race condition between when
execve fails and when we subsequently check whether the file exists means
we could be hoodwinked into reporting the wrong error message in both
directions.

Yes, it's clearly a kernel problem that the shell is trying to overcome.
There was a lot of discussion about this the last time it came up. I think
Andrea even filed a Linux kernel bug report.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

    • Re: Unfor... Dale R. Worley
      • Re: U... AA via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
        • R... Dale R. Worley
          • ... Andrew Athan via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
            • ... Chet Ramey
        • R... Martin D Kealey
          • ... Andrew Athan via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
            • ... AA via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
              • ... Chet Ramey
              • ... AA via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
          • ... Chet Ramey
        • R... Chet Ramey
  • Re: Unfortunat... Kerin Millar

Reply via email to