On Sun, Feb 6, 2022, at 11:53 PM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:02 AM Greg Wooledge <g...@wooledge.org> wrote: >> There are other programming languages besides bash. Some of them can >> store NUL bytes internally, either by encoding and decoding them on the >> fly, or by not using C-style strings internally (which means any system >> calls require encoding/decoding the internal strings to C-style strings). > > i am not sure, but, tell me > 'c strings' is a problem due to internal function handling with static \0 eof > while 'c strings' can store null bytes no ? ( tell me if this is true > or not plz )
It is not true. C strings are terminated by NUL. > then if, its up to the coding buddies to self code How generous of you to volunteer other people's time and effort. > its so simple: > you have always static length strings simply, u conunt and know the > length of every msg used, and so u can separate right > isnt it so simple ? It's so simple that you should have no problem converting the entire bash codebase to Pascal-style strings yourself. We'll wait. >> I urge you to learn one of these other languages, and use it. > > i cant read others docs it seems buddy, it budds mee, its like the web > docs about shell scripting, as you i and i wrote on our pages, its > very invalid > and so i cant learn a new language sorry Tragic. -- vq
