Hi. Thank for your answer.
Will ksh93 version ever get to upstream? This ugly 'bug' is here for decades and really irritates me and many people, who ever used shell for larger scripting and don't like to use tabs.
Best regards P. On 8/30/21 11:14 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Přemysl Šťastný wrote:I think, it would be nice, if you implemented Squiggly heredoc, which solves this problem by ignoring both leading spaces and leading tabs. eg. func()( cat <<~ EOF blabla EOF )'<<~' is already syntactically valid. bash-5.1$ cat <<~ heredoc> foo heredoc> bar heredoc> ~ foo bar bash-5.1$ cat <<~EOF heredoc> foo heredoc> bar heredoc> ~EOF foo bar bash-5.1$ echo abc >EOF; cat <<~ EOF heredoc> foo heredoc> bar heredoc> ~ abc ksh93s (I think) implemented a version of this behavior using '<<#'. That's currently a syntax error in bash, unless interactive_comments is disabled. bash-5.1$ shopt -s interactive_comments bash-5.1$ cat <<# EOF bash: syntax error near unexpected token `newline' bash-5.1$ shopt -u interactive_comments bash-5.1$ echo abc >EOF; cat <<# EOF heredoc> foo heredoc> bar heredoc> # abc
OpenPGP_0x2FD4F23C65C1A5F0_and_old_rev.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
