i also wanna say
no extraction method is no good for a coding language ( no extraction as is
only minus ( substraction ) is possible but no .. )
why dont you just enable backreferences \<number> of match
for ${var/ and //
and impent a regex variant, as you do by [[ =~ anyway
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:00 PM Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> as for goal, and no believance, it is handling quoting, string issues,
> nothing else
> you may know if you think about it im a freelance code there is nothing
> now but major functionality issues
> ..
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:57 PM Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> what, dude, of course you can regex eerything right
>> that is, for no quotes
>> till non escaped end, ] probably
>> for " its till nonescaped "
>> and for $' till nonescaped '
>>
>> i can regex it or extglob it
>> hm ?
>> but i need the results of grouping of the matches ( '( .. )' )
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:39 PM Greg Wooledge <g...@wooledge.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:44:06PM +0100, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
>>> > isnt it obvious ..
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> > ${var//@(abc|cde)@(bla|blubb)/\2\1} # just like sed
>>> > and an extension for regex there
>>>
>>> That's a feature request. Chet can discuss that with you.
>>>
>>> All I can tell you is that this feature is not in any way suitable for
>>> retrieving an element from an associative array. If it actually existed,
>>> which of course it doesn't.
>>>
>>> > as for example, i can give you my garbage data
>>> >
>>> > begin='declare -A a' end='declare -p a' per2 'a[$per]=' *
>>> > declare -A a=(["\\\\"]="" ["] \$( eval echo shitt )"]="" [$'abc
>>> > \034[22]="bar"']="" [$'\034']="" [$'\n']="" [2]="" ["]"]="" [" a
>>> b"]=""
>>> > ["' [b"]="" ["\" ["]="" [$'\' [1]=\034']="" ["];eval echo shitt"]=""
>>> > [$'foo\034 [2]="blah" ']="" [abc]="" ["abc [22]=\"bar\""]="" [blah]=""
>>> )
>>>
>>> I cannot make ANY sense of this. I don't know what you're doing or why.
>>>
>>> Whatever you're doing, it's ridiculously convoluted and obscure. There
>>> is probably some MUCH easier way to achieve the goal. If you would just
>>> tell us the goal, we might be able to help you do it.
>>>
>>>
