Hi All,

   From what we have found out, it does not seem like the signal is
   SIGTTOU. We are working to find out more about it. Meanwhile, any
   insight would be helpful.

   Thanks and Regards,
   Rishita Saha

     ----- Original message -----
     From: Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu>
     To: "CHIGOT, CLEMENT" <clement.chi...@atos.net>, Rishita Saha16
     <risah...@in.ibm.com>, "bug-bash@gnu.org" <bug-bash@gnu.org>
     Cc: chet.ra...@case.edu
     Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Issue with Bash
     Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2020 8:01 PM

   On 7/9/20 10:16 AM, CHIGOT, CLEMENT wrote:
   > Hi Rishita,
   >
   > Could you try with BullFreeware's version, which have a slightly
   higher version (5.0.11 instead of 5.0) ?
   > You can find it at
   [1]http://www.bullfreeware.com/pkg?id=5740 <[2]http://www.bullfreeware.
   com/pkg?id=6102 >.
   >
   > If it's not working, I'll check what's wrong.
   It's not clear that any of those patches will affect this behavior. I'd
   be more interested in knowing the signal, and, if it's SIGTTOU, whether
   the process is an interactive shell. (Because if it's not, and I can't
   imagine that running httpd is going to start an interactive shell, why
   is it calling readline to get input?)
   Chet
   --
   ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
   ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
   Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    c...@case.edu
   [3]http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

References

   1. http://www.bullfreeware.com/pkg?id=5740
   2. http://www.bullfreeware.com/pkg?id=6102
   3. http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Reply via email to