On 1/21/20 4:13 PM, William Theisen wrote:
> I've just tested this, it's a little awkward but does actually work. Thanks
> for the suggestion I'll play around with making it a little more
> convenient to use. Thanks for your time.
If you don't want to destroy your script's positional parameters, you can
wrap your loop in a shell function, which has its own set.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
