On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:32 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > > On 4/11/19 3:08 PM, konsolebox wrote: > > >>> It has slightly inconvenient semantics, in that you can't open it more > >>> than once, and if you can't do that, you can't convert it from read-write > >>> to readonly. > >> > >> > >> Perhaps it can be reopened via /dev/fd. > > > > Also file sealing maybe. The way it restricts writing is just a > > little different. > > It seems like if you don't mmap the file, you won't create the shared > writable mapping that would restrict you from sealing the file against > writes.
Ok, thanks for the reply. I'll check these theories myself next weekend. -- konsolebox
