On 2019-03-21 20:14, Chet Ramey wrote:
Thanks for the report. The /dev/fd version of this code needs to reap
process substitutions a little more often. It can't be *too* aggressive,
since the fds can still be read even after the process generating the
data has terminated, but it can do a little more.

This will be fixed in the next devel branch push.

I look forward to trying it out. Thank you for staying on top of things so well.

Reply via email to