> It's in the devel branch. Try it and see if it does what you want. Yes, it does. Thanks!
>Пятница, 1 марта 2019, 19:44 +03:00 от Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu>: > >On 2/28/19 5:53 PM, Айрат Васбикарамов wrote: >>> It seems like what you want is min(history_lines_this_session, >>> history_offset), >>> kind of like what you say below. Try the attached patch and see if it >>> does what you want. >> >> Yes, that's what I mean. >> >>> I don't think this would happen too much in practice, though, because if >>> you wait until you have more than $HISTSIZE history entries, you'll lose >>> information no matter what you use. >> >> I don't think that happens frequent either. But it's possible. Someone set >> HISTSIZE to 1000 as he don't care about too old commands and it's happened >> that he typed more than 1000 command. Then he run "history -a" to >> synchronize current history with another started bash for example. And lost >> recent commands. Possibly he notice it. But may not. >> >> Anyway I don't see downsides of this behavior comparing to current. And it >> seems more intuitive to me. So should it be default? > >It's in the devel branch. Try it and see if it does what you want. > >Chet > >-- >``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer >``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates >Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/ -- Airat Vasbikaramov
