On 20/1/2019 19:50, Eduardo A. Bustamante López wrote: > Changing the behavior of `unset f' to only ever unset variables means > potentially breaking existing scripts. Is the inconsistency reported severe > enough to make this change?
The alternative would be to allow anything (that is not a proper variable name) after unset, and if it can't be a variable name, only the functions need to be checked and unset if they exist. Peter
