On 12/4/17 1:42 PM, H.-Dirk Schmitt wrote:
> From the 2 replies I unterstand that the implementation in bash is
> correct due to the „official“ standard.
>
> For myself I have solved the issue in my script - but the regular
> expression I developed for my problem are without the 'non-greedy'
> operator more difficult to read and maintain. From that point of view
> it would be an improvement for bash to implement the non-greedy
> operator.
The thing is, bash doesn't "implement" its regular expressions, per se.
Bash uses the Posix standard library functions (regcomp/regexec) if they
are available in the C library when it's configured and built. I'm not
wild about adding a dependency on pcre, or a configure test for it, just
to have two varieties of regular expressions available.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
