On 12/1/17 2:00 PM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> Also, there's a lot of problems reported at
> unix.stackexchange.com at least that are caused by bash not
> waiting for the processes started by process substitutions,
> especially the >(...) form.
Bash always reaps these processes. Do you mean waiting for them
to terminate before executing the next command?
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
